|
|
#1 |
|
Worldshaper
Hosted Project
Clan Member [Chieftain] Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Heidelberg, Germany
Posts: 1,480
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The new wc3 patch introduced hash-tables to gui and fixed various jass issues, including the return bug.
Several jass-focused maps (including DotA) abused this return bug in order to get a hash-similar effect. As a result, those maps don't work anymore until they use blizzards newly introduced functions instead. To sum it up: -DotA doesn't work right now, this might be an opportunity for less popular maps to give it a try. -The return bug doesn't work anymore, you might want to fix your maps if you made use of it. -You can now easily use Hash Tables in GUI as well. Check http://www.clancbs.com/board/showthread.php?t=3672 for more info.
__________________
Currently Working on (Finished maps are listed in b.net profile): Soulchess 1.22 CBS Joining Requirements Debug Collection |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Ancient Clan Legend
Clan Member [Grunt]
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Germany
Posts: 2,328
![]() ![]() ![]() |
It's only a matter of days til the next DotA gets out, i believe. It would really be a great time to host our maps. Sadly, there's not many new maps left.
Go Soulchess, go RvsS! |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
ツ
Clan Member [Grunt]
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 155
![]() |
Blizzard fails.
Code:
function H2I takes handle h returns integer return h call DoNothing() return 0 endfunction Code:
function F takes nothing returns boolean
if true then
return true
elseif true then
endif
return true
endfunction
This crashes maps, though it's a legit function. Blizzard also failed to notify about 90% of gamers (non-mappers) about this game-breaking patch. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Ancient Clan Legend
Clan Member [Grunt]
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Germany
Posts: 2,328
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Wonder why they couldn't leave it the way it is. It's way too late to bring out a revolutionary patch for mapmakers. And if i remember right, most things were working right?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
1K Korn // God of Rep
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,288
![]() |
its time for ToJ! mwhahhahahah *owns all with a lazer gun*
__________________
My Projects: CBX - Creature Battle X (finished/paused) TeaserMy resources: LotK's aura pack | LotK's aura pack 2 | LotK's missle pack RPG terrain made by me and Doomed Crusader Get the official Space Rogues wallpaper here! My Tutorials: Very small sized loading screens My Videos: Kon Stantine [ger] | CBX Gameplay 1 2 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
WTFTW!
Clan Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: England - South West [Dorset]
Posts: 167
![]() |
Quote:
Its blizzards duty as a company to get this issue fixed [and from what I've read at wc3c.net it hasn't exactly worked, DiamondBlade highlights this above.] And the fact DotA is out of commision for a few days, as brilliant news. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Worldshaper
Hosted Project
Clan Member [Chieftain] Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Heidelberg, Germany
Posts: 1,480
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
this totally reminds me of the people in charge of the last few wc3 patches...
__________________
Currently Working on (Finished maps are listed in b.net profile): Soulchess 1.22 CBS Joining Requirements Debug Collection |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
ツ
Clan Member [Grunt]
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 155
![]() |
> They couldn't leave it the way it was simply because of the arbitrary exploit
Actually, that was fixed before 1.24. Though I guess by fixing the return bug, they're preventing any potential problems in the future. Instead of checking/counting/w.e the returns though, why can't the morons just check if the return is of the correct type? ¬_¬ I mean.. How much can you fuck things up to break ifs. ._. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
WTFTW!
Clan Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: England - South West [Dorset]
Posts: 167
![]() |
Quote:
Im not saying this patch was perfect, far from it, just that Blizzard was justified to [attempt to] break compatibility by removing the return bug. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
ツ
Clan Member [Grunt]
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 155
![]() |
It's possible that, that's the case. I just heard that it was fixed. No more details.
As I don't go on b.net much, I'm not interested. > Blizzard was justified to [attempt to] break compatibility by removing the return bug. I'm sure there were other things they could've done. How about only removing C2I and I2C? Also, don't forget that they didn't actually remove the return bug. Apparently, this still works: Code:
function H2I takes handle h returns integer
return h
call DoNothing()
return 0
endfunction
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|